Hi Rohit,
On Fri, 24 Jul 2020, Rohit Bharadwaj wrote:
On 24/07/20 1:58 pm, Greg KH wrote:
On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 01:44:27PM +0530, Rohit Bharadwaj wrote:
On 24/07/20 10:06 am, Rohit K Bharadwaj wrote:
changed usage of slave (deprecated) to secondary
Signed-off-by: Rohit K Bharadwaj <bharadwaj.rohit8@xxxxxxxxx>
---
v3: change patch subject, add version history
v2: add changelog text in body of mail
v1: fix style issues by changing usage of slave to secondary
drivers/staging/nvec/nvec.c | 12 ++++++------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/nvec/nvec.c b/drivers/staging/nvec/nvec.c
index 360ec0407740..5d7b66719a39 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/nvec/nvec.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/nvec/nvec.c
@@ -718,7 +718,7 @@ static irqreturn_t nvec_interrupt(int irq, void *dev)
return IRQ_HANDLED;
}
-static void tegra_init_i2c_slave(struct nvec_chip *nvec)
+static void tegra_init_i2c_secondary(struct nvec_chip *nvec)
{
u32 val;
@@ -744,7 +744,7 @@ static void tegra_init_i2c_slave(struct nvec_chip *nvec)
}
#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
-static void nvec_disable_i2c_slave(struct nvec_chip *nvec)
+static void nvec_disable_i2c_secondary(struct nvec_chip *nvec)
{
disable_irq(nvec->irq);
writel(I2C_SL_NEWSL | I2C_SL_NACK, nvec->base + I2C_SL_CNFG);
@@ -784,7 +784,7 @@ static int tegra_nvec_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
platform_set_drvdata(pdev, nvec);
nvec->dev = dev;
- if (of_property_read_u32(dev->of_node, "slave-addr", &nvec->i2c_addr)) {
+ if (of_property_read_u32(dev->of_node, "secondary-addr", &nvec->i2c_addr)) {
dev_err(dev, "no i2c address specified");
return -ENODEV;
}
as Christoph said, please don't change this line.
@@ -839,7 +839,7 @@ static int tegra_nvec_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
}
disable_irq(nvec->irq);
- tegra_init_i2c_slave(nvec);
+ tegra_init_i2c_secondary(nvec);
/* enable event reporting */
nvec_toggle_global_events(nvec, true);
@@ -913,7 +913,7 @@ static int nvec_suspend(struct device *dev)
if (!err)
nvec_msg_free(nvec, msg);
- nvec_disable_i2c_slave(nvec);
+ nvec_disable_i2c_secondary(nvec);
return 0;
}
@@ -923,7 +923,7 @@ static int nvec_resume(struct device *dev)
struct nvec_chip *nvec = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
dev_dbg(nvec->dev, "resuming\n");
- tegra_init_i2c_slave(nvec);
+ tegra_init_i2c_secondary(nvec);
nvec_toggle_global_events(nvec, true);
return 0;
Dear All, this message was not delivered to marvin24@xxxxxx, I'm getting that The response from the remote server was:
554 gmx.net (mxgmx016) Nemesis ESMTP Service not available No SMTP service Reject due to policy restrictions,
Not a big deal, email address atrophy over time. That's why you always
cc: a public mailing list for patches.
yes, my mail provider introduces a bit too aggressive mail filtering
recently, causing me being unsubscribed frequently. I just changed my subscriber
address, which should fix the problem, sorry.
Marc
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
