On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 02:03:36PM +0200, Roland Vossen wrote: > The reason that I am investing time in the ASSERT/WARN_ON etc > patches is that Greg KH does not want ASSERT statement in our > driver. It would be great if I could simply replace all ASSERTs with > WARN_ONs (inversing the condition checked of course), so I can focus > on improving code readability. That doesn't make sense, why replace them all with warnings? Why would those thing ever need an assert in the first place? Please rework the code to never need them, or, if they are a real case, then properly handle them without a warning being sent to the user who really has no idea how to handle them. thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
