From: Roland Vossen <rvossen@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Code cleanup. The comment is hinting that we should sanity check the
header to verify that if it claims its from a 5Ghz channel, that the
chip actually supports 5 Ghz. This is redundant (2.4G only chips do
not report 5G channels) and thus the comment was removed.
Signed-off-by: Roland Vossen <rvossen@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Arend van Spriel <arend@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxx>
---
drivers/staging/brcm80211/brcmsmac/wlc_main.c | 1 -
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/brcm80211/brcmsmac/wlc_main.c b/drivers/staging/brcm80211/brcmsmac/wlc_main.c
index 7853570..38330e7 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/brcm80211/brcmsmac/wlc_main.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/brcm80211/brcmsmac/wlc_main.c
@@ -6847,7 +6847,6 @@ prep_mac80211_status(struct wlc_info *wlc, d11rxhdr_t *rxh, struct sk_buff *p,
channel = WLC_CHAN_CHANNEL(rxh->RxChan);
- /* XXX Channel/badn needs to be filtered against whether we are single/dual band card */
if (channel > 14) {
rx_status->band = IEEE80211_BAND_5GHZ;
rx_status->freq = ieee80211_ofdm_chan_to_freq(
--
1.7.4.1
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
