On 2019/9/6 21:38, Dmitry Osipenko wrote: > 29.08.2019 18:49, Thierry Reding пишет: >> On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 04:58:22PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote: >>> 29.08.2019 15:40, Thierry Reding пишет: >>>> On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 01:39:32PM +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote: >>>>> On 8/26/19 3:31 PM, YueHaibing wrote: >>>>>> If COMPILE_TEST is y and IOMMU_SUPPORT is n, selecting TEGRA_VDE >>>>>> to m will set IOMMU_IOVA to m, this fails the building of >>>>>> TEGRA_HOST1X and DRM_TEGRA which is y like this: >>>>>> >>>>>> drivers/gpu/host1x/cdma.o: In function `host1x_cdma_init': >>>>>> cdma.c:(.text+0x66c): undefined reference to `alloc_iova' >>>>>> cdma.c:(.text+0x698): undefined reference to `__free_iova' >>>>>> >>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/drm.o: In function `tegra_drm_unload': >>>>>> drm.c:(.text+0xeb0): undefined reference to `put_iova_domain' >>>>>> drm.c:(.text+0xeb4): undefined reference to `iova_cache_put' >>>>>> >>>>>> Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@xxxxxxxxxx> >>>>>> Fixes: 6b2265975239 ("media: staging: tegra-vde: Fix build error") >>>>>> Fixes: b301f8de1925 ("media: staging: media: tegra-vde: Add IOMMU support") >>>>>> Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@xxxxxxxxxx> >>>>>> --- >>>>>> drivers/staging/media/tegra-vde/Kconfig | 4 ++-- >>>>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >>>>>> >>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/tegra-vde/Kconfig b/drivers/staging/media/tegra-vde/Kconfig >>>>>> index ba49ea5..a41d30c 100644 >>>>>> --- a/drivers/staging/media/tegra-vde/Kconfig >>>>>> +++ b/drivers/staging/media/tegra-vde/Kconfig >>>>>> @@ -1,9 +1,9 @@ >>>>>> # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 >>>>>> config TEGRA_VDE >>>>>> tristate "NVIDIA Tegra Video Decoder Engine driver" >>>>>> - depends on ARCH_TEGRA || COMPILE_TEST >>>>>> + depends on ARCH_TEGRA >>>>> >>>>> What happens if you drop this change, >>>>> >>>>>> select DMA_SHARED_BUFFER >>>>>> - select IOMMU_IOVA if (IOMMU_SUPPORT || COMPILE_TEST) >>>>>> + select IOMMU_IOVA if IOMMU_SUPPORT >>>>> >>>>> but keep this change? >>>>> >>>>> iova.h has stubs that are used if IOMMU_IOVA is not set, so it should >>>>> work when compile testing this tegra-vde driver. >>>>> >>>>> Haven't tried it, but making sure that compile testing keep working is >>>>> really important. >>> >>> The driver's code compilation works okay, it's the linkage stage which >>> fails during compile-testing. >>> >>>> Yeah, that variant seems to work for me. I think it's also more correct >>>> because the IOMMU_IOVA if IOMMU_SUPPORT dependency really says that the >>>> IOVA usage is bound to IOMMU support. If IOMMU support is not enabled, >>>> then IOVA is not needed either, so the dummies will do just fine. >>> >>> Am I understanding correctly that you're suggesting to revert [1][2] and >>> get back to the other problem? >>> >>> [1] >>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-media/dd547b44-7abb-371f-aeee-a82b96f824e2@xxxxxxxxx/T/ >>> [2] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1136619/ >>> >>> If we want to keep compile testing, I guess the only reasonable variant >>> right now is to select IOMMU_IOVA unconditionally in all of the drivers >>> (vde, host1x, drm and etc) and then just ignore that IOVA will be >>> compiled-and-unused if IOMMU_SUPPORT=n (note that IOMMU_SUPPORT=y in all >>> of default kernel configurations). >> >> Agreed. I think we should just select IOMMU_IOVA unconditionally. We >> really do want IOMMU_SUPPORT always as well, but it might be nice to be >> able to switch it off for testing or so. In the cases that really matter >> we will be enabling both IOMMU_SUPPORT and IOMMU_IOVA anyway, so might >> as well select IOMMU_IOVA always. It's not terribly big and I can't >> imagine anyone wanting to run a kernel without IOMMU_SUPPORT for >> anything other than testing. > > Hello Yue, > > Could you please make an updated version of the fix in accordance to the above comments? > > Alternatively, we can go with the current patch and temporarily remove the compile-testing. I'll make > patches to properly re-add compile-testing sometime later then. I prefer to do this choice, thanks. > > . > _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel