> {
> - struct erofs_vnode *vi = ptr;
> -
> - inode_init_once(&vi->vfs_inode);
> + inode_init_once(&((struct erofs_inode *)ptr)->vfs_inode);
Why doesn't this use EROFS_I? This looks a little odd.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
