Hi Yue, On 2019/6/26 11:28, Yue Hu wrote: > From: Yue Hu <huyue2@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Already check if ->datamode is supported in read_inode(), no need to check > again in the next fill_inline_data() only called by fill_inode(). > > Signed-off-by: Yue Hu <huyue2@xxxxxxxxxx> You should add all the 'Reviewed-by' / 'Acked-by' / ... tags from other guyes to the following versions when you resend your patches. Thanks, Gao Xiang > --- > drivers/staging/erofs/inode.c | 2 -- > 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/erofs/inode.c b/drivers/staging/erofs/inode.c > index e51348f..d6e1e16 100644 > --- a/drivers/staging/erofs/inode.c > +++ b/drivers/staging/erofs/inode.c > @@ -129,8 +129,6 @@ static int fill_inline_data(struct inode *inode, void *data, > struct erofs_sb_info *sbi = EROFS_I_SB(inode); > const int mode = vi->datamode; > > - DBG_BUGON(mode >= EROFS_INODE_LAYOUT_MAX); > - > /* should be inode inline C */ > if (mode != EROFS_INODE_LAYOUT_INLINE) > return 0; > _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
