On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 8:13 PM Fabio Estevam <festevam@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Matheus, > Hi, Fabio > On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 8:01 PM Matheus Tavares > <matheus.bernardino@xxxxxx> wrote: > > > > This patch adds the SPDX GPL-2.0-only license identifier to ad2s90.c, > > which solves the checkpatch.pl warning: > > "WARNING: Missing or malformed SPDX-License-Identifier tag in line 1". > > > > Signed-off-by: Matheus Tavares <matheus.bernardino@xxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/staging/iio/resolver/ad2s90.c | 1 + > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/iio/resolver/ad2s90.c b/drivers/staging/iio/resolver/ad2s90.c > > index 949ff55ac6b0..f439da721df8 100644 > > --- a/drivers/staging/iio/resolver/ad2s90.c > > +++ b/drivers/staging/iio/resolver/ad2s90.c > > @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@ > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only > > This should be: > // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 Hm, but it seems that the identifier "GPL-2.0" is deprecated, look: https://spdx.org/licenses/GPL-2.0.html. It has been updated to "GPL-2.0-only" in license list v3 (https://spdx.org/licenses/GPL-2.0-only.html). Is there some other reason to use the deprecated "GPL-2.0" that I'm not aware of? Thanks, Matheus _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
