Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] staging: iio: ad7780: generates pattern_mask from PAT bits

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi

>While I agree that it looks nicer to indent all these to the same level,
>you also need to think about the fact that the kernel git repo is already
>pretty big as-is, so it's a good idea if a patch adds as much code/semantic
>value [as possible] with as little change [as possible] and with as good of
>readability [as possible].

Understood. But can't someone else submit another patch fixing these
indentation issues? That would be another commit and more stuff to the
repository.
On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 11:51 AM Ardelean, Alexandru
<alexandru.Ardelean@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2018-11-08 at 11:03 -0200, Giuliano Belinassi wrote:
> > Previously, all pattern_masks and patterns in the chip_info table were
> > hardcoded. Now they are generated using the PAT macros, as described in
> > the datasheets.
>
> One comment about indentation/whitespace.
>
> Rest looks good.
>
> Alex
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Giuliano Belinassi <giuliano.belinassi@xxxxxx>
> > ---
> > Changes in v2:
> >       - Added the PATTERN and PATTERN_MASK macros
> >       - Update BIT macros alignment to match with PATTERN
> >       - Generate pattern mask with PATTERN_MASK macros.
> >
> > drivers/staging/iio/adc/ad7780.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++-------------
> >  1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/iio/adc/ad7780.c
> > b/drivers/staging/iio/adc/ad7780.c
> > index 9ec2b002539e..ff8e3b2d0efc 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/iio/adc/ad7780.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/iio/adc/ad7780.c
> > @@ -22,14 +22,22 @@
> >  #include <linux/iio/sysfs.h>
> >  #include <linux/iio/adc/ad_sigma_delta.h>
> >
> > -#define AD7780_RDY   BIT(7)
> > -#define AD7780_FILTER        BIT(6)
> > -#define AD7780_ERR   BIT(5)
> > -#define AD7780_ID1   BIT(4)
> > -#define AD7780_ID0   BIT(3)
> > -#define AD7780_GAIN  BIT(2)
> > -#define AD7780_PAT1  BIT(1)
> > -#define AD7780_PAT0  BIT(0)
> > +#define AD7780_RDY           BIT(7)
> > +#define AD7780_FILTER                BIT(6)
> > +#define AD7780_ERR           BIT(5)
> > +#define AD7780_ID1           BIT(4)
> > +#define AD7780_ID0           BIT(3)
> > +#define AD7780_GAIN          BIT(2)
> > +#define AD7780_PAT1          BIT(1)
> > +#define AD7780_PAT0          BIT(0)
>
> Changing indentation here doesn't add much value; it's mostly
> patch/whitespace noise.
>
> While I agree that it looks nicer to indent all these to the same level,
> you also need to think about the fact that the kernel git repo is already
> pretty big as-is, so it's a good idea if a patch adds as much code/semantic
> value [as possible] with as little change [as possible] and with as good of
> readability [as possible].
> [ Kind of sounds like a balance act between the 3 things ].
>
>
> > +
> > +#define AD7780_PATTERN               (AD7780_PAT0)
> > +#define AD7780_PATTERN_MASK  (AD7780_PAT0 | AD7780_PAT1)
> > +
> > +#define AD7170_PAT2          BIT(2)
> > +
> > +#define AD7170_PATTERN               (AD7780_PAT0 | AD7170_PAT2)
> > +#define AD7170_PATTERN_MASK  (AD7780_PAT0 | AD7780_PAT1 | AD7170_PAT2)
> >
> >  struct ad7780_chip_info {
> >       struct iio_chan_spec    channel;
> > @@ -136,26 +144,26 @@ static const struct ad_sigma_delta_info
> > ad7780_sigma_delta_info = {
> >  static const struct ad7780_chip_info ad7780_chip_info_tbl[] = {
> >       [ID_AD7170] = {
> >               .channel = AD7780_CHANNEL(12, 24),
> > -             .pattern = 0x5,
> > -             .pattern_mask = 0x7,
> > +             .pattern = AD7170_PATTERN,
> > +             .pattern_mask = AD7170_PATTERN_MASK,
> >               .is_ad778x = false,
> >       },
> >       [ID_AD7171] = {
> >               .channel = AD7780_CHANNEL(16, 24),
> > -             .pattern = 0x5,
> > -             .pattern_mask = 0x7,
> > +             .pattern = AD7170_PATTERN,
> > +             .pattern_mask = AD7170_PATTERN_MASK,
> >               .is_ad778x = false,
> >       },
> >       [ID_AD7780] = {
> >               .channel = AD7780_CHANNEL(24, 32),
> > -             .pattern = 0x1,
> > -             .pattern_mask = 0x3,
> > +             .pattern = AD7780_PATTERN,
> > +             .pattern_mask = AD7780_PATTERN_MASK,
> >               .is_ad778x = true,
> >       },
> >       [ID_AD7781] = {
> >               .channel = AD7780_CHANNEL(20, 32),
> > -             .pattern = 0x1,
> > -             .pattern_mask = 0x3,
> > +             .pattern = AD7780_PATTERN,
> > +             .pattern_mask = AD7780_PATTERN_MASK,
> >               .is_ad778x = true,
> >       },
> >  };
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Kernel USP" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to kernel-usp+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.
> To post to this group, send email to kernel-usp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.
> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/kernel-usp/43efc182fc7ab9aa1d2f1ca798e27d85c7132e1f.camel%40analog.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux