Re: [PATCH 2/2] Staging: bcm: Bcmnet: fixed 'checkpatch.pl' issues

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



A: No.
Q: Should I include quotations after my reply?

http://daringfireball.net/2007/07/on_top

On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 09:16:29AM -0800, Vinay Sawal wrote:
> Sorry for the confusion. I used the same branch to generate two
> unrelated patches. And that's probably why the second patch (this)
> came out the way it did. If you don't think that's the reason then I
> am sorry I don't know what's going on. I am new to the community and
> this is my first attempt at submitting a kernel patch. At least I
> won't use the same branch to generate multiple patches until I learn
> more.
> 
> Two questions:
> 
> (1) Shall I generate a new patch ?

No, it's fine.

> (2) I used 'git send-email ...' to send the patch. Did the patch
> format come out ok or do I need to fix things on my end ?

At first glance it looked ok, I'll know for sure in a few days when I go
to apply it to the tree.

thanks,

greg k-h
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux