Re: [PATCH 2/2] Staging: bcm: Bcmnet: fixed 'checkpatch.pl' issues

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Sorry for the confusion. I used the same branch to generate two
unrelated patches. And that's probably why the second patch (this)
came out the way it did. If you don't think that's the reason then I
am sorry I don't know what's going on. I am new to the community and
this is my first attempt at submitting a kernel patch. At least I
won't use the same branch to generate multiple patches until I learn
more.

Two questions:

(1) Shall I generate a new patch ?

(2) I used 'git send-email ...' to send the patch. Did the patch
format come out ok or do I need to fix things on my end ?

Thanks,
Vinay


On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 8:17 AM, Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 10:58:22PM -0800, Vinay Sawal wrote:
>> Fixed all issues reported by 'checkpatch.pl' for this file.
>
> Where is the 1/2 patch in this series?
>
> confused,
>
> greg k-h
>
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux