On Sat, Jul 28, 2018 at 10:08:28PM +0400, sepehrdad.dev@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > From: sepehrdad sh <sepehrdad.dev@xxxxxxxxx> > > Fixed multiple coding style issue > > Signed-off-by: Sepehrdad Sh <sepehrdad.dev@xxxxxxxxx> Your subject line is very odd :( > --- a/drivers/staging/fbtft/flexfb.c > +++ b/drivers/staging/fbtft/flexfb.c > @@ -667,11 +667,14 @@ static int flexfb_probe_common(struct spi_device *sdev, > case 8: > par->fbtftops.write_vmem = fbtft_write_vmem16_bus8; > if (!par->startbyte) > - par->fbtftops.verify_gpios = flexfb_verify_gpios_dc; > + par->fbtftops.verify_gpios = ( > + flexfb_verify_gpios_dc); That's a very strange change. Do you know C well? Because this is not how you do such a modification :( thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
