On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 11:39 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 10:58:11PM -0700, Todd Poynor wrote:
>> From: Todd Poynor <toddpoynor@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Remove unnecessary variable.
>>
>> Bail out if no physical device.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Todd Poynor <toddpoynor@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/staging/gasket/gasket_core.c | 19 ++++++-------------
>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/gasket/gasket_core.c b/drivers/staging/gasket/gasket_core.c
>> index 65aa7cf454fb..f7d8f66e8746 100644
>> --- a/drivers/staging/gasket/gasket_core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/staging/gasket/gasket_core.c
>> @@ -915,8 +915,6 @@ static int gasket_enable_dev(
>> {
>> int tbl_idx;
>> int ret;
>> - bool has_dma_ops;
>> - struct device *ddev;
>> const struct gasket_driver_desc *driver_desc =
>> internal_desc->driver_desc;
>>
>> @@ -934,26 +932,21 @@ static int gasket_enable_dev(
>> return ret;
>> }
>>
>> - has_dma_ops = true;
>> + if (!gasket_dev->pci_dev) {
>> + gasket_log_error(gasket_dev,
>> + "%s: no physical device", __func__);
>> + return -ENODEV;
>> + }
>
> How can this ever be true? I don't see where this can be removed to
> enable this error check to be hit. What am I missing?
Agree, I'll split this into two patches for the two things it does,
and just remove the unnecessary check. Thanks,
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
--
Todd
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
