Re: [PATCH 2/4] staging: goldfish: Fix checkpatch warnings in goldfish_audio.c

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jun 01, 2018 at 11:31:21AM -0700, rkir@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Roman Kiryanov <rkir@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Address issues pointed by checkpatch.pl

"issues"?  Plural?

> 
> Signed-off-by: Roman Kiryanov <rkir@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/goldfish/goldfish_audio.c | 7 +++++--
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/goldfish/goldfish_audio.c b/drivers/staging/goldfish/goldfish_audio.c
> index 3a4715cd362b..2bec3205326e 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/goldfish/goldfish_audio.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/goldfish/goldfish_audio.c
> @@ -308,8 +308,11 @@ static int goldfish_audio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "platform_get_irq failed\n");
>  		return -ENODEV;
>  	}
> -	data->buffer_virt = dmam_alloc_coherent(&pdev->dev,
> -				COMBINED_BUFFER_SIZE, &buf_addr, GFP_KERNEL);
> +	data->buffer_virt =
> +		dmam_alloc_coherent(&pdev->dev,
> +				    COMBINED_BUFFER_SIZE,
> +				    &buf_addr,
> +				    GFP_KERNEL);

Ick, why?  What's wrong with the original code?

Or better yet, how about:
	data->buffer_virt = dmam_alloc_coherent(&pdev->dev,
						COMBINED_BUFFER_SIZE,
						&buf_addr, GFP_KERNEL);

if you really want to get picky about it.

thanks,

greg k-h
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux