Would it makes sense to land LNet and LNDs on their own first? Get the networking house in order first before layering on the file system? Doug > On Jun 1, 2018, at 11:20 AM, Andreas Dilger <adilger@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Jun 1, 2018, at 7:41 AM, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Thanks, >> >> all that churn without much visible progress to a mergeable codebase >> was really ennoying. >> >> I'd recommend if people want to merge lustre they start with a managable >> subset first, e.g. the fs client code with simple IP-only networking. > > Adding or removing the IB networking makes basically no difference to the > code size. This would also make the client much less useful, since a large > number of sites use Lustre with IB networks. > > Cheers, Andreas > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > lustre-devel mailing list > lustre-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-devel-lustre.org _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
