On Sat, Apr 21, 2018 at 07:41:35AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 02:01:25PM -0700, Richard Cochran wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 01:40:08PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > > > This driver seems nice and so far as I can see it doesn't need to be in > > > staging once we get the other parts merged. > > > > Please explain how this unit ties in with the MAC units. > > > > I have no idea. I assumed there were some dependencies which prevented > this code from being merged into the normal part of the kernel. From > what I can see the code looks nice so if there aren't dependencies then > we should put it in the normal part instead of in staging. My question is really for Yangbo... If the driver can't work without out-of-tree hacks, then it shouldn't be merged (but I wouldn't object in that case for inclusion in staging just so users can integrate it). So we need to understand how this clock driver will be connected to the time stamping MAC drivers. Thanks, Richard _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
