On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 11:56 AM, Dan Carpenter
<dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 11:14:59AM +0100, Sergio Paracuellos wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 10:49 AM, Dan Carpenter
>> <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 08:19:20PM +0100, Sergio Paracuellos wrote:
>> >> This commit replaces MichaelBlockFunction macro with similar inline function
>> >> renaming it to michael_block.
>> >>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Sergio Paracuellos <sergio.paracuellos@xxxxxxxxx>
>> >> ---
>> >> drivers/staging/ks7010/michael_mic.c | 30 +++++++++++++++---------------
>> >> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>> >>
>> >> diff --git a/drivers/staging/ks7010/michael_mic.c b/drivers/staging/ks7010/michael_mic.c
>> >> index 6829cb5..07913d0 100644
>> >> --- a/drivers/staging/ks7010/michael_mic.c
>> >> +++ b/drivers/staging/ks7010/michael_mic.c
>> >> @@ -48,17 +48,17 @@ static void michael_init(struct michael_mic_t *mic, uint8_t *key)
>> >> michael_clear(mic);
>> >> }
>> >>
>> >> -#define MichaelBlockFunction(L, R) \
>> >> -do { \
>> >> - R ^= rol32(L, 17); \
>> >> + *l ^= rol32(*l, 17);
>> >
>> > It feels like this should be:
>> >
>> > *r ^= rol32(*l, 17);
>> >
>> > right?
>>
>> True. Thanks for catching this. Should I resend v2 or whole patch
>> series or only for this patch?
>>
>
> I don't know? I think Greg prefers if you resend the whole thing.
Agreed. I'll fix things you pointed me out and resend v2 of whole series.
Thanks,
>
> regards,
> dan carpenter
>
Best regards,
Sergio Paracuellos
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
