> On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 06:10:00PM +0000, Long Li wrote: > > > From: Greg KH [mailto:gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > > > Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2017 1:43 AM > > > To: Long Li <longli@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Cc: KY Srinivasan <kys@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Haiyang Zhang > > > <haiyangz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Stephen Hemminger > > > <sthemmin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > > > linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Paul Meyer <Paul.Meyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] hv: kvp: Avoid reading past allocated blocks > > > from KVP file > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 05:08:03PM -0700, Long Li wrote: > > > > From: Paul Meyer <Paul.Meyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > While reading in more than one block (50) of KVP records, the > > > > allocation goes per block, but the reads used the total number of > > > > allocated records (without resetting the pointer/stream). This > > > > causes the records buffer to overrun when the refresh reads more > > > > than one block over the previous capacity (e.g. reading more than > > > > 100 KVP records > > > whereas the in-memory database was empty before). > > > > > > Please wrap changelogs at 72 columns like your editor asked you to... > > > > I will fix it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Fix this by reading the correct number of KVP records from file each time. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Paul Meyer <Paul.Meyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > --- > > > > > > Why is your name not also on the signed-off-by chain if you are > > > forwarding on a patch from someone else? > > > > > > Is this patch also needed on stable kernels? > > > > I'm sending on behalf of Paul Meyer. I will add a "Reviewed-by:" tag. > > Sending on behalf means you should add your signed-off-by, as it is going > through you. Thanks. I will re-send the patch. > > thanks, > > greg k-h _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
