Re: [PATCH v3] staging: wlan-ng: Remove unnecessary parentheses

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 11:48:21AM -0400, Frank A. Cancio Bello wrote:
> Remove unnecessary parentheses to comply with preferred coding style for
> the linux kernel and avoid the following checkpatch's messages:
> 'CHECK: Unnecessary parentheses around'
> 'CHECK: Logical continuations should be on the previous line'
> 
> Credits to checkpatch.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Frank A. Cancio Bello <frank@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Changes in v3:
> 	* Exclude any parentheses removal that makes unclear the order of the operations.
> 
> Changes in v2:
> 	* I rewrote the log message to improve the style taking in consideration Julia's suggestions.
> 	* I merged in this patch similars changes that initially were in theirs own patch. I will reply that other patch email thread, saying to discard it, to avoid confussion.
> 
>  drivers/staging/wlan-ng/p80211req.c  |  2 +-
>  drivers/staging/wlan-ng/prism2fw.c   | 21 ++++++++++-----------
>  drivers/staging/wlan-ng/prism2mgmt.c | 23 +++++++++++------------
>  drivers/staging/wlan-ng/prism2sta.c  |  4 ++--
>  4 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/wlan-ng/p80211req.c b/drivers/staging/wlan-ng/p80211req.c
> index afe8477..0d1556c 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/wlan-ng/p80211req.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/wlan-ng/p80211req.c
> @@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ int p80211req_dorequest(struct wlandevice *wlandev, u8 *msgbuf)
>  
>  	/* Check Permissions */
>  	if (!capable(CAP_NET_ADMIN) &&
> -	    (msg->msgcode != DIDmsg_dot11req_mibget)) {
> +	    msg->msgcode != DIDmsg_dot11req_mibget) {

While this is not making the code _harder_ to read, it is not making it any easier either. So all
the change is really doing is quieting checkpatch. Usually it is not a good idea to make code
changes _just_ to quieten a static analysis tool. It's just a tool remember, there to help us write
better code.

On top of that CHECKS are just that, things that should be CHECK'ed, not necessarily fixed.

Hope this helps,
Tobin.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux