RE: [PATCH] staging: brcm80211: implementation of RFKILL functionality

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 08:35 -0800, Arend Van Spriel wrote:
> Hi Greg,
> 
> It would seem to, but I am following guideline from Documentation/rfkill.txt, section 3. Kernel API:
> ""
> To create an rfkill driver, driver's Kconfig needs to have
> 
>         depends on RFKILL || !RFKILL
> 
> to ensure the driver cannot be built-in when rfkill is modular. The !RFKILL
> case allows the driver to be built when rfkill is not configured, which which
> case all rfkill API can still be used but will be provided by static inlines
> which compile to almost nothing.
> ""
> 
> I am not sure if this is really needed as cfg80211 does most of rfkill work for us.

It shouldn't be necessary, since you depend on cfg80211's API. However,
since you depend on cfg80211 you have this effect anyway since cfg80211
has this dependency.

johannes

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux