On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 05:16:56PM +0200, Marcus Wolf wrote: > Hi Greg, > > according to the proposals of Walter Harms, I revised the rf69.c: I replaced > some macros with inline functions and removed some obsolete ifdefs. According to > walter this will improve the resource situation. In addition the readybility is > enhanced, since lines got shorter. It's a quite big change, that touched nearly > every function in that file. > I was testing the new code for a while now and did not observer a problem so > far. But I don't have a kind of unit test, so my tests for sure didn't cover > everything. > > Is it a good time, to submit such a change in these days, or is it prefrable to > submit it later? > In adition, I am a bit afraid of my current mailtool doing something > unexpected... You can send patches anytime, don't worry about timing, I can handle putting them in the correct patch queue. > P.S. Can you process diffs fom SVN, too, or is it mandatory to create the diff > with git? As long as it is in normal patch format, I can apply it. Personally, I use quilt to generate patche, which uses 'diff', and that works just fine. thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
