On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 05:16:56PM +0200, Marcus Wolf wrote: > Hi Greg, > > according to the proposals of Walter Harms, I revised the rf69.c: I replaced > some macros with inline functions and removed some obsolete ifdefs. According to > walter this will improve the resource situation. In addition the readybility is > enhanced, since lines got shorter. It's a quite big change, that touched nearly > every function in that file. Just send your patches, we can't discuss them without seeing them. > I was testing the new code for a while now and did not observer a problem so > far. But I don't have a kind of unit test, so my tests for sure didn't cover > everything. Any sort of testing is probably better than 70% of staging patches. :P > > Is it a good time, to submit such a change in these days, or is it prefrable to > submit it later? It doesn't matter when you send patches. > In adition, I am a bit afraid of my current mailtool doing something > unexpected... > > If you like, I can give it a try! > > Cheers, > > Marcus > P.S. Can you process diffs fom SVN, too, or is it mandatory to create the diff > with git? The patches have to be able to be applied with `cat email.txt | git am`. If you're renaming or moving files, then use git diff. Otherwise it's all fine. regards, dan carpenter _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
