On Sat, Aug 19, 2017 at 09:47:28PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-08-16 at 10:31 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 10:53:18AM +0530, Rishabh Hardas wrote:
> > > @@ -143,10 +142,13 @@ struct pi433_rx_cfg {
> > >
> > > #define PI433_IOC_MAGIC 'r'
> > >
> > > -#define PI433_IOC_RD_TX_CFG _IOR(PI433_IOC_MAGIC, PI433_TX_CFG_IOCTL_NR, char[sizeof(struct pi433_tx_cfg)])
> > > -#define PI433_IOC_WR_TX_CFG _IOW(PI433_IOC_MAGIC, PI433_TX_CFG_IOCTL_NR, char[sizeof(struct pi433_tx_cfg)])
> > > -
> > > -#define PI433_IOC_RD_RX_CFG _IOR(PI433_IOC_MAGIC, PI433_RX_CFG_IOCTL_NR, char[sizeof(struct pi433_rx_cfg)])
> > > -#define PI433_IOC_WR_RX_CFG _IOW(PI433_IOC_MAGIC, PI433_RX_CFG_IOCTL_NR, char[sizeof(struct pi433_rx_cfg)])
> > > +#define PI433_IOC_RD_TX_CFG _IOR(PI433_IOC_MAGIC, PI433_TX_CFG_IOCTL_NR,\
> > > + char[sizeof(struct pi433_tx_cfg)])
> > > +#define PI433_IOC_WR_TX_CFG _IOW(PI433_IOC_MAGIC, PI433_TX_CFG_IOCTL_NR,\
> > > + char[sizeof(struct pi433_tx_cfg)])
> > > +#define PI433_IOC_RD_RX_CFG _IOR(PI433_IOC_MAGIC, PI433_RX_CFG_IOCTL_NR,\
> > > + char[sizeof(struct pi433_rx_cfg)])
> > > +#define PI433_IOC_WR_RX_CFG _IOW(PI433_IOC_MAGIC, PI433_RX_CFG_IOCTL_NR,\
> > > + char[sizeof(struct pi433_rx_cfg)])
> >
> >
> > These don't help readability. The original was better.
>
> The original wasn't any good either.
>
> It'd be better to avoid the macros altogether
> as almost all are use-once.
>
>
So should I keep this as it is or remove the macros ?
Because as Dan said the corrections that I made aren't goo either.
Regards
Rishabh Hardas
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
