On Thu, 2017-06-15 at 17:06 +0100, James Simmons wrote: > > On Wed, 2017-06-14 at 11:01 -0400, James Simmons wrote: > > > Cleanup many of the over 80 characters reported by checkpatch > > > > Please don't let checkpatch get in the way of lustre > > readability. > > > > lustre commonly uses very long identifiers. > > Long identifiers and 80 columns don't mix well. > > > > It might be simpler to declare in some document that > > lustre uses lines of up to whatever length and require > > that checkpatch should be used with the --max-line-length > > option when run on lustre code. > > Greg would you be okay with this? I trust Greg isn't a zealot. Linus Torvalds has said he prefers a longer line length (up to 100 cols) https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/12/15/749 > If we changed to a max-line-length to > say 128 thay would mean very few checkpatch issues would remain. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
