> On Wed, 2017-06-14 at 11:01 -0400, James Simmons wrote: > > Cleanup many of the over 80 characters reported by checkpatch > > Please don't let checkpatch get in the way of lustre > readability. > > lustre commonly uses very long identifiers. > Long identifiers and 80 columns don't mix well. > > It might be simpler to declare in some document that > lustre uses lines of up to whatever length and require > that checkpatch should be used with the --max-line-length > option when run on lustre code. Greg would you be okay with this? If we changed to a max-line-length to say 128 thay would mean very few checkpatch issues would remain. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
