On 06/11/2017 01:05 PM, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
On 06/10/2017 02:26 AM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
On 10/06/17 01:16, Steve Longerbeam wrote:
On 06/07/2017 12:02 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
We're still waiting for an Ack for patch 02/34, right?
Hi Hans, Rub has provided an Ack for patch 2.
Other than that everything is ready AFAICT.
But as Pavel pointed out, in fact we are missing many
Acks still, for all of the dts source changes (patches
4-14), as well as really everything else (imx-media staging
driver patches).
No Acks needed for the staging part. It's staging, so not held
to the same standards as non-staging parts. That doesn't mean
Acks aren't welcome, of course.
Acks are wanted for particular i.MX DTS changes including device
tree binding descriptions.
Shawn, please bless the series.
I second that request!
There are a couple minor update to the ARM dts patches for imx6,
I will post a new series for them. But there should not be anything of
much controversy in these ARM dts patches.
Steve
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
