On 06/10/2017 02:26 AM, Hans Verkuil wrote: > On 10/06/17 01:16, Steve Longerbeam wrote: >> >> >> On 06/07/2017 12:02 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote: >>> We're still waiting for an Ack for patch 02/34, right? >>> >> >> Hi Hans, Rub has provided an Ack for patch 2. >> >>> Other than that everything is ready AFAICT. >>> >> >> But as Pavel pointed out, in fact we are missing many >> Acks still, for all of the dts source changes (patches >> 4-14), as well as really everything else (imx-media staging >> driver patches). > > No Acks needed for the staging part. It's staging, so not held > to the same standards as non-staging parts. That doesn't mean > Acks aren't welcome, of course. Acks are wanted for particular i.MX DTS changes including device tree binding descriptions. Shawn, please bless the series. > > You don't need Greg's Ack for staging/media either, patches there > go in via us (generally at least) and we handle those, not Greg. > -- With best wishes, Vladimir _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
