On 12/15/2010 07:58 PM, Hank Janssen wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Timo TerÃs [mailto:timo.teras@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Timo TerÃs >> Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2010 2:02 AM >> On 12/13/2010 10:46 PM, Hank Janssen wrote: >>>> -----Original Message----- >>> I was in the process of testing this but the patches fail to apply. >>> What version of linux-next was this done against? It is looking for >>> The file vmbus.c which was removed on December 2nd. >>> >>> Do you want me to take the content of the patches and reroll them >>> Against the latest linux-next tree or do you like to reroll them yourself? >> >> They were against Linus' linux-2.6 tree, and I think I checked them to apply >> for Greg's staging-2.6 tree. Apparently I had wrong checkout or something. >> I'll send shortly the same patches against linux-next-2.6 (compile tested >> only). > > These patches pass my smoke testing. So it looks good from my side. > I did IDE/SCSI/Network high level testing and it all works good. Cool! > Checkpatch on my side did give me a few warning messages, so you might > Want to check it (extra spaces, formatting - simple stuff) Bummer. I used different editor than usual to do the rebasing. It must've messed up that. > If you want you can add Reviewed-By: Hank Janssen <hjanssen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Thanks you again for doing this. Ok, I'll resend soon once more with white space stuff fixed. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
