On 12/13/2010 10:46 PM, Hank Janssen wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Hank Janssen >> Sent: Saturday, December 11, 2010 6:33 PM >> To: 'Timo TerÃs'; Greg Kroah-Hartman; devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> As discussed earlier, this gets rid of the osd_schedule_callback which >>> is unneeded abstraction and inefficient. This also fixes the sleeping >>> while atomic issue which could happen due to bad usage of >>> osd_schedule_callback. >>> >>> Patches are compile tested only. Especially patch #2 needs review on >>> the assumption I made that rescind work cannot be pending while >>> free_channel is called. >> >> Thank you for doing this! I will do a test run on it on Monday, I do not have >> Access to a Hyper-V machine this weekend. >> > > I was in the process of testing this but the patches fail to apply. > What version of linux-next was this done against? It is looking for > The file vmbus.c which was removed on December 2nd. > > Do you want me to take the content of the patches and reroll them > Against the latest linux-next tree or do you like to reroll them yourself? They were against Linus' linux-2.6 tree, and I think I checked them to apply for Greg's staging-2.6 tree. Apparently I had wrong checkout or something. I'll send shortly the same patches against linux-next-2.6 (compile tested only). _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
