On 11/29/2010 11:01 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On Mon, 29 Nov 2010 22:59:11 +0100 Peter Hüwe wrote: > >>> Are you sure? I'm used to these being gcc warnings, not sparse. >> You're right - these are generated by gcc ;) sorry for the confusion. >> >>> Also, this fixes the warnings on x86_64 but not on x86_32/i386: >> You're right again, I'm on x86_64 - so what should I use instead? > > I dunno, I've tried to fix this myself and the only thing that I have > been successful with is casting those ioctl values to (unsigned long) > and using %lx to print them. What about to remove that completely :)? I don't see what that could be good for -- everybody from userspace can print it... regards, -- js _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
