On Mon, 29 Nov 2010 22:59:11 +0100 Peter Hüwe wrote: > > Are you sure? I'm used to these being gcc warnings, not sparse. > You're right - these are generated by gcc ;) sorry for the confusion. > > > Also, this fixes the warnings on x86_64 but not on x86_32/i386: > You're right again, I'm on x86_64 - so what should I use instead? I dunno, I've tried to fix this myself and the only thing that I have been successful with is casting those ioctl values to (unsigned long) and using %lx to print them. > (atleast the patch fixes the size_t format strings ;) agreed. --- ~Randy *** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code *** _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
