On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 03:38:40PM +0200, Dan Carpenter wrote: > On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 10:46:47PM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 08:11:20AM +0200, Dan Carpenter wrote: > > > We never use control_req so I removed it. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > Leftover cruft from when lirc_imon also supported the devices now covered > > by the ir-core imon driver. > > > > Speak of left over stuff, it's weird that I didn't notice this before > but gcc complains about an unitialized variable in > imon_incoming_packet(). > > drivers/staging/lirc/lirc_imon.c: In function ‘imon_incoming_packet’: > drivers/staging/lirc/lirc_imon.c:661: warning: ‘chunk_num’ may be used > uninitialized in this function > > I don't know how to fix that, but it looks important. Ew. Yeah, that doesn't look so hot like it is right now. The old lirc_imon driver had chunk_num = buf[7], and made much more extensive use of chunk_num. Simply removing chunk_num and using buf[7] should be fine. Signed-off-by: Jarod Wilson <jarod@xxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/staging/lirc/lirc_imon.c | 4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/staging/lirc/lirc_imon.c b/drivers/staging/lirc/lirc_imon.c index 6649325..2351c88 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/lirc/lirc_imon.c +++ b/drivers/staging/lirc/lirc_imon.c @@ -599,7 +599,7 @@ static void imon_incoming_packet(struct imon_context *context, struct device *dev = context->driver->dev; int octet, bit; unsigned char mask; - int i, chunk_num; + int i; /* * just bail out if no listening IR client @@ -658,7 +658,7 @@ static void imon_incoming_packet(struct imon_context *context, } } - if (chunk_num == 10) { + if (buf[7] == 10) { if (context->rx.count) { submit_data(context); context->rx.count = 0; -- Jarod Wilson jarod@xxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel