On 08/10/2010 12:29 AM, Pekka Enberg wrote: > On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 8:26 PM, Nitin Gupta <ngupta@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Each zram device maintains an array (table) that maps >> index within the device to the location of corresponding >> compressed chunk. Currently we store 'struct page' pointer, >> offset with page and various flags separately which takes >> 12 bytes per table entry. Now all these are encoded in a >> single 'phys_add_t' value which results in savings of 4 bytes >> per entry (except on PAE systems). >> >> Unfortunately, cleanups related to some variable renames >> were mixed in this patch. So, please bear some additional >> noise. > > The noise makes this patch pretty difficult to review properly. Care > to spilt the patch into two pieces? > Ok, I will split them as separate patches. Thanks for all the reviews and Acks. Nitin _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel