On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 04:31:28PM +0100, John Sheehan wrote: > From: John Sheehan <john.d.sheehan@xxxxxxxxx> > > A patch for s626.c to fix errors reported by > checkpatch.pl tool, namely, > code indent should use tabs where possible > "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" > trailing statements should be on next line > > Signed-off-by: John Sheehan <john.d.sheehan@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/s626.c | 67 +++++++++++++++++++-------------- > 1 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/s626.c b/drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/s626.c > index a3cc933..83e1bb1 100644 > --- a/drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/s626.c > +++ b/drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/s626.c > @@ -60,10 +60,10 @@ INSN_CONFIG instructions: > insn.insn=INSN_CONFIG; //configuration instruction > insn.n=1; //number of operation (must be 1) > insn.data=&initialvalue; //initial value loaded into encoder > - //during configuration > + //during configuration Why change this? > insn.subdev=5; //encoder subdevice > insn.chanspec=CR_PACK(encoder_channel,0,AREF_OTHER); //encoder_channel > - //to configure > + //to configure Why is this line indented so much now? Care to resend this without these changes? thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel