Joe Perches wrote: > On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 01:33 +0200, Sven Eckelmann wrote: > > Joe Perches wrote: > > > On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 01:23 +0200, Sven Eckelmann wrote: > > > > You've also changed the output. So you may partly broke batctl too > > > > (have to check that first). > > > > > > There was no change in output. > > > MAC_FMT output is the same as %pM > > > > I meant the other patch :) > > batctl is parsing dmesg or equivalent? ouch. It has functionality to parse logfiles which for example could come from dmesg. > If so, may I suggest you consider using something other than > a message logging parser for batctl? > > I glanced at the source and don't see any such use. > It looks like it's only /sys, /proc and debugfs, > but I only spent a few seconds at it. > > http://www.open-mesh.net/changeset/1682/trunk?old_path=%2F&format=zip see sys.c -> log_print and read_file -> read_file Best regards, Sven
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
