On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 01:33 +0200, Sven Eckelmann wrote: > Joe Perches wrote: > > On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 01:23 +0200, Sven Eckelmann wrote: > > > You've also changed the output. So you may partly broke batctl too (have > > > to check that first). > > There was no change in output. > > MAC_FMT output is the same as %pM > I meant the other patch :) batctl is parsing dmesg or equivalent? ouch. If so, may I suggest you consider using something other than a message logging parser for batctl? I glanced at the source and don't see any such use. It looks like it's only /sys, /proc and debugfs, but I only spent a few seconds at it. http://www.open-mesh.net/changeset/1682/trunk?old_path=%2F&format=zip cheers, Joe _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
