Re: [PATCH] Staging: vt6656: remove unnecessary #ifdef

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 07:12:54AM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 09:46:41PM -0700, Charles Cl?ment wrote:
> > On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 03:00:56PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 03:47:27PM -0700, Charles Cl?ment wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Charles Cl?ment <caratorn@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > >  drivers/staging/vt6656/ttype.h |    5 -----
> > > >  1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/vt6656/ttype.h b/drivers/staging/vt6656/ttype.h
> > > > index 692b63e..5768862 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/staging/vt6656/ttype.h
> > > > +++ b/drivers/staging/vt6656/ttype.h
> > > > @@ -133,11 +133,6 @@ typedef DWORD *          PDWORD;
> > > >  
> > > >  typedef QWORD *          PQWORD;
> > > >  
> > > > -// handle declaration
> > > > -#ifdef STRICT
> > > >  typedef void *HANDLE;
> > > > -#else
> > > > -typedef void *HANDLE;
> > > > -#endif
> > > 
> > > This doesn't apply at all :(
> > 
> > That is strange, I could apply it without problem with today's tree.
> 
> What tree are you making this against?  Please do it against the
> linux-next tree, not Linus's tree.
> 

I checked out the tag next-20100511, so I think it is the linux-next
tree. Maybe there's a problem with the way I update my repository,
that's what I do:

git remote update
git checkout -b latest-next next-20100511

Thanks,

-- 
Charles Clément

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux