On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 01:06:16PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > John W. Linville wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 08:42:45AM +0200, Olivier Galibert wrote: > >> On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 11:12:42PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > >>> On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 10:55:18PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > >>>> Not really, patchwork shows status immediately. > >>> Immediately when someone does something with it, right? So, the same as > >>> my development cycle? > >> I guess the main difference is that patchwork allows one contributor > >> to see that his patch has just not been checked yet, vs. missed/lost. > > > > In Greg's defense, I find patchwork to be fairly unwieldy (which is > > why I don't use it). It is certainly possible that I am missing some > > key feature, but my limited experience with it suggested to me that all > > the clicky-clicky stuff required to deal with the individual messages > > queued in patchwork nearly doubled my time overhead associated with > > merging patches. > > > Just from a patch submitter perspective, I'd like to see some kind of > response. I can believe what you say about patchwork, so I wouldn't > advocate it. > > I agree to Joe's perspective that Greg is overbooked regarding time. > I think that this is an ongoing problem, not just a current one that > will go away, so for me, the question is what is Greg willing to do > about it? Greg is not going to take up 3 months of his life and sell and buy a house and move. Seriously, that took up all of my "free" time, and it's now over, and I am catching up on things, give me a short ammount of time please. thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
