On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 08:42:45AM +0200, Olivier Galibert wrote: > On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 11:12:42PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 10:55:18PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > > > Not really, patchwork shows status immediately. > > > > Immediately when someone does something with it, right? So, the same as > > my development cycle? > > I guess the main difference is that patchwork allows one contributor > to see that his patch has just not been checked yet, vs. missed/lost. In Greg's defense, I find patchwork to be fairly unwieldy (which is why I don't use it). It is certainly possible that I am missing some key feature, but my limited experience with it suggested to me that all the clicky-clicky stuff required to deal with the individual messages queued in patchwork nearly doubled my time overhead associated with merging patches. John -- John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx might be all we have. Be ready. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
