Ooops. Let's try again. ---- Had ran through a little comparison between OLPC's 2.6.31 source http://dev.laptop.org/git/olpc-2.6/tree/?h=olpc-2.6.31 with the mainstream kernel source, version 2.6.31-12 http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-2.6.31.y.git;a=tree;hb=5e20b95750867086fff98e5c3eaa00c3bc01d8eeand I saw the difference is only in gxfb_core.c and lxfb_core.c regarding the configuration flag, i.e.
CONFIG_OLPC -> |CONFIG_OLPC_XO_1 so I think efforts required for the Geode driver is very little.OTOH, I think making the changes on the OLPC sources regarding XO-1 support back to the mainstream is necessary before getting the DCON driver back. Simply merge the DCON driver but keep the configuration flag CONFIG_OLPC is not a good idea.
I actually had made the changes on my own. I only added changes related to XO-1 only, as I don't own a XO-1.5 yet that I cannot test it. I can send it in along with the DCON driver integration patch when I get back to work tomorrow. Otherwise I'll simply compile the kernel off the source pulled off OLPC's git.
regards, Raymond| On 2010年02月24日 22:02, Greg KH wrote:
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 09:59:30PM +0800, Raymond Lai wrote:<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> <html>Sorry, but the driverdev mailing list rejects html email :( Care to try it again? thanks, greg k-h
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel