On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 11:46:48PM +0000, Hank Janssen wrote: > >> On a side note, when this becomes mainstream, could you give it a more > >> descriptive name than just "hv"? "Hv" already means at least two > >> possible things to me -- "hypervisor" or "high volume" -- neither of > >> which appear to be what this code is about. > > > >"hyperv" should be sufficient, right? > > > >thanks, > > > >greg k-h > > I was thinking of using that, but would that confuse it with hypervisor > which is more of a general term? If the consensus is that it would not than > I am in favor of changing it to hyperv. > > ms_hyperv would make it to long? I don't believe "hyperv" is a generally-used abbreviation of "hypervisor". You could do "ms_hyperv" if you like, but I wouldn't regard the "ms_" prefix as essential. Paul. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
