>> On a side note, when this becomes mainstream, could you give it a more >> descriptive name than just "hv"? "Hv" already means at least two >> possible things to me -- "hypervisor" or "high volume" -- neither of >> which appear to be what this code is about. > >"hyperv" should be sufficient, right? > >thanks, > >greg k-h I was thinking of using that, but would that confuse it with hypervisor which is more of a general term? If the consensus is that it would not than I am in favor of changing it to hyperv. ms_hyperv would make it to long? Thanks, Hank. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
