On Sat, Jan 09, 2010 at 11:44:38AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 08, 2010 at 06:57:54PM +1100, horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > I think this is correct.
> >
> > $ gcc (Debian 4.4.2-8) 4.4.2
> > Copyright (C) 2009 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> > This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
> > warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
> >
> > $ make
> > ...
> > drivers/staging/otus/80211core/ratectrl.c: In function
> > 'zfRateCtrlRateDiff':
> > drivers/staging/otus/80211core/ratectrl.c:433: warning: suggest parentheses
> > around comparison in operand of '=='
> > ...
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Index: linux-2.6/drivers/staging/otus/80211core/ratectrl.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/staging/otus/80211core/ratectrl.c 2010-01-08 17:13:44.000000000 +1100
> > +++ linux-2.6/drivers/staging/otus/80211core/ratectrl.c 2010-01-08 17:14:02.000000000 +1100
> > @@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ u8_t zfRateCtrlRateDiff(struct zsRcCell*
> > {
> > return ((rcCell->currentRateIndex - i)+1)>>1;
> > }
> > - else if (i == rcCell->currentRateIndex == 0)
> > + else if (i == rcCell->currentRateIndex)
>
> You realize you have reversed the meaning of the test? The original
> was the same as if (i != rcCell->currentRateIndex).
>
> Your patch is possibly correct, but it's hard to know. I would
> leave this for now until someone grovels through the code to find
> out for sure if it should be == or !=. If we silence the warning,
> no one will ever look at this code again.
Good point, I withdraw this patch.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
