Greg KH <gregkh at suse.de> writes: > > It's the "normal" way of cleaning up code. Start with a known-working > piece of stuff, and incrementally clean it up. I have to agree with David. This is essentially unreviewable in the original state. It would be good if you could do all the obvious cleanups first and then post a consolidated series. Most "obvious" cleanups should not change the binary, so you can easily check they are correct by comparing the assembler code. -Andi -- ak at linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
