On Jun 22, 2009, at 5:36, Bernd Petrovitsch <bernd at firmix.at> wrote: > On Sun, 2009-06-21 at 21:13 -0400, J.R. Mauro wrote: >> On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 8:52 PM, Pavel Roskin<proski at gnu.org> wrote: > [...] >>> But the best fix would be to replace hfa384x_t with "struct >>> hfa384x" as >>> the Linux coding standard requires. Then GNU indent would do the >>> right >>> thing. >> >> And now I remember what my fix was: Lindent does not understand the >> usual typedefs that we use, such as u8, and will mung those as well. >> My fix simply added a bunch of the standard typedefs to Lindent so >> that it wouldn't change ``u8 *up'' to ``u8 * up'' >> >> As I recall, there was no interest in it on LKML. If anyone thinks it > > Only LKML? Perhaps it just get lost. > Do kbuild people take such patches? I don't know > > >> has value, I can dig up the patch if you want to ACK it. > > IMHO it has. I can try mailing it to kbuild, I'll CC you > > > Bernd > -- > Firmix Software GmbH http://www.firmix.at/ > mobil: +43 664 4416156 fax: +43 1 7890849-55 > Embedded Linux Development and Services > >
