On 28/10/07 18:02, Frank Mori Hess wrote: > On Sunday 28 October 2007 12:55, Greg KH wrote: >> On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 12:19:31PM -0400, Frank Mori Hess wrote: >>> On Friday 26 October 2007 00:38, Greg KH wrote: >>>> Some of the things you might not want in the cvs tree (#ifdef >>>> removals for old kernel versions), but the majority should not be an >>>> issue (typedef removals, whitespace, proper driver core integration, >>>> etc.) >> What about these issues? Will you take patches to remove the backward >> compatibility portions of comedi? > > Yes. Although, most of the remaining compatibility code has always been > kept in separate header files that are transparently included before the > kernel's real headers. So there should be no need to remove it. Might be worth creating a CVS branch for the kernel inclusion patches to avoid leaving the trunk in an unusable state. -- -=( Ian Abbott @ MEV Ltd. E-mail: <abbotti at mev.co.uk> )=- -=( Tel: +44 (0)161 477 1898 FAX: +44 (0)161 718 3587 )=-
