On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 4:43 AM Brendan Higgins
<brendanhiggins@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 8:01 PM David Gow <davidgow@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, May 15, 2021 at 3:59 PM David Gow <davidgow@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sat, May 8, 2021 at 5:31 AM Brendan Higgins
> > > <brendanhiggins@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Add basic support to run QEMU via kunit_tool. Add support for i386,
> > > > x86_64, arm, arm64, and a bunch more.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Tested-by: David Gow <davidgow@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > >
> > > > Changes since last revision:
> > > >
> > > > - A number of minor obvious issues pointed out by David and Daniel.
> > > > - Added facility for merging Kconfigs at Daniel's suggestion.
> > > > - Broke out qemu_configs each into their own config file which is loaded
> > > > dynamically - mostly at David's suggestion.
> > > >
> > > > ---
> > >
> > > This seems pretty good to me. I only have one real complaint --
> > > qemu_configs needing to be in a subdirectory of ./tools/testing/kunit
> > > -- but am able to tolerate that (even if I'd prefer not to have it) if
> > > it's documented properly.
> > >
> > > Otherwise, save for a couple of minor nitpicks, this seems good to go.
> > >
> > > Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > >
> >
> > One thing I forgot to mention is that I'm not 100% sure about the
> > Kconfig fragments being embedded in the qemu_configs. I still kind-of
> > prefer the idea of them being in separate config files. While I don't
>
> I don't feel strongly either way, but I don't have a good idea on how
> to implement your idea well. How about we leave it for now, and if you
> decide you really want to do something about it, you can do it?
>
> > think this is necessarily a blocker, I did just realise that, by
> > default, kunit.py run --arch=<non-UM-arch> will pull its default
> > .kunitconfig from arch/um/configs/kunit_defconfig, which definitely
> > feels awkward when UML is not otherwise involved.
>
> Hmmm...this file is identical to
> tools/testing/kunit/configs/all_tests.config. Maybe we should just use
> that instead?
>
That sounds like a better plan. It looks like all_tests.config isn't
used anywhere, anyway. I might rename it and replace the
arch/um/.../kunit_defconfig version in another patch, then.
> > Some further thoughts below (which range a bit from "practical
> > suggestion" to "overcomplicated ponderings", so don't feel the
> > pressure to take all of them).
> >
> > (...snip...)
> >
> > > > diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py
> > > > index e22ade9d91ad5..2bd196fd69e5c 100644
> > > > --- a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py
> > > > +++ b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py
> > > > @@ -6,23 +6,31 @@
> > > > # Author: Felix Guo <felixguoxiuping@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > > # Author: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > >
> > > > +from __future__ import annotations
> > > > +import importlib.util
> > > > import logging
> > > > import subprocess
> > > > import os
> > > > import shutil
> > > > import signal
> > > > from typing import Iterator
> > > > +from typing import Optional
> > > >
> > > > from contextlib import ExitStack
> > > >
> > > > +from collections import namedtuple
> > > > +
> > > > import kunit_config
> > > > import kunit_parser
> > > > +import qemu_config
> > > >
> > > > KCONFIG_PATH = '.config'
> > > > KUNITCONFIG_PATH = '.kunitconfig'
> > > > DEFAULT_KUNITCONFIG_PATH = 'arch/um/configs/kunit_defconfig'
> >
> > This being in arch/um doesn't seem great if its being used for non-UML
> > builds. Is it worth either:
> > (a) moving this somewhere else (e.g., tools/testing/kunit/configs as
> > with the BROKEN_ALLCONFIG_PATH beflow), or
>
> How about we use: tools/testing/kunit/configs/all_tests.config ? The
> file is identical.
Yeah: I'm not thrilled with the name all_tests.config, but since it
doesn't appear to be being used anywhere, I might just rename it in
another patch.
> > (b) giving each architecture its own kunit_defconfig, possibly in
> > place of the qemuconfig member of QemuArchParams
> >
> > I'm leaning towards (b), which solves two different sources of
> > ugliness in one go, though it would appear to have the downside that
> > the default .kunitconfig could end up being architecture specific,
> > which isn't great.
>
> Yeah, I am not a fan of trying to solve that problem in this patchset.
> This is sounding more and more like what should be follow-on work to
> me.
Yeah, I'm not sure exactly what that should look like yet, anyway.
Let's keep things as they are in this patch. I'll put a follow-up
patch to use all_tests.config rather than the arch/um one (possibly as
part of my "default to ALL_TESTS" patchset), and if we think of
something better that is more architecture specific, we'll do that.
> > > > BROKEN_ALLCONFIG_PATH = 'tools/testing/kunit/configs/broken_on_uml.config'
> > > > OUTFILE_PATH = 'test.log'
> > > > +ABS_TOOL_PATH = os.path.abspath(os.path.dirname(__file__))
> > > > +QEMU_CONFIGS_DIR = os.path.join(ABS_TOOL_PATH, 'qemu_configs')
> > > >
> >
> > (...snip...)
> >
> > > > diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/qemu_config.py b/tools/testing/kunit/qemu_config.py
> > > > new file mode 100644
> > > > index 0000000000000..aff1fe0442dbc
> > > > --- /dev/null
> > > > +++ b/tools/testing/kunit/qemu_config.py
> > > > @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
> > > > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > > > +#
> > > > +# Collection of configs for building non-UML kernels and running them on QEMU.
> > > > +#
> > > > +# Copyright (C) 2021, Google LLC.
> > > > +# Author: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > +
> > > > +from collections import namedtuple
> > > > +
> > > > +
> > > > +QemuArchParams = namedtuple('QemuArchParams', ['linux_arch',
> > > > + 'qemuconfig',
> >
> > As mentioned, I'm not thrilled about keeping the Kconfig inline here,
> > and would kind-of prefer it to be in another file. I could live with
> > it if I have to, though. Regardless, 'qemuconfig' is not a
>
> It will be fixed in the next revision.
>
> > super-descriptive name, particularly as it's not clear if this is
> > configuring QEMU (no, that's extra_qemu_params'), or configuring the
> > kernel for QEMU compatibility.
>
> Any suggestions on a better name? qemu_build_config_path? These
> configs contain configs for configuring, building, and running kernels
> on QEMU.
I don't think we need "qemu" in the name, as this is already part of
the QemuArchParams struct, and isn't a qemu config, but a kernel one.
Something along the lines of "kernel_config" (or just "kconfig") maybe?
> > > > + 'qemu_arch',
> > > > + 'kernel_path',
> > > > + 'kernel_command_line',
> > > > + 'extra_qemu_params'])
> > > > +
> > >
> > > Nit: newline at end of file.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/qemu_configs/alpha.py b/tools/testing/kunit/qemu_configs/alpha.py
> > > > new file mode 100644
> > > > index 0000000000000..2cc64f848ca2c
> > > > --- /dev/null
> > > > +++ b/tools/testing/kunit/qemu_configs/alpha.py
> > > > @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
> > > > +from ..qemu_config import QemuArchParams
> > > > +
> > > > +QEMU_ARCH = QemuArchParams(linux_arch='alpha',
> > > > + qemuconfig='''
> > > > +CONFIG_SERIAL_8250=y
> > > > +CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_CONSOLE=y''',
> >
> > If these were in a separate file, they could be shared across alpha,
> > i386, x86_64, etc. Of course, that wouldn't gel well with putting them
> > in arch/.../config. If there were some way of listing multiple files,
> > it could form part of the config for several more architectures,
> > though that's probably overcomplicating things.
>
> Yeah, like I said, I have sympathy for what you are saying here, but
> it really feels like something that can and should be addressed in
> follow on patches. We could totally address this issue later by
> expanding this field to take either a string containing a Kconfig, or
> a path to an external Kconfig; if we do so, it won't cause any
> migration issues in the future.
>
Yeah: I think we can solve this if it actually becomes a problem. No
need to change anything here.
> > > > + qemu_arch='alpha',
> > > > + kernel_path='arch/alpha/boot/vmlinux',
> > > > + kernel_command_line='console=ttyS0',
> > > > + extra_qemu_params=[''])
> > > > diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/qemu_configs/arm.py b/tools/testing/kunit/qemu_configs/arm.py
> > > > new file mode 100644
> > > > index 0000000000000..29a043b0531a0
> > > > --- /dev/null
> > > > +++ b/tools/testing/kunit/qemu_configs/arm.py
> > > > @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
> > > > +from ..qemu_config import QemuArchParams
> > > > +
> > > > +QEMU_ARCH = QemuArchParams(linux_arch='arm',
> > > > + qemuconfig='''
> > > > +CONFIG_ARCH_VIRT=y
> > > > +CONFIG_SERIAL_AMBA_PL010=y
> > > > +CONFIG_SERIAL_AMBA_PL010_CONSOLE=y
> > > > +CONFIG_SERIAL_AMBA_PL011=y
> > > > +CONFIG_SERIAL_AMBA_PL011_CONSOLE=y''',
> >
> > Similarly, if in a separate file and there were some multiple-file
> > mechanism, these could mostly be shared between arm & arm64 (ARCH_VIRT
> > being the only problem). Again, probably overcomplicating it at this
> > point though.
>
> Right.
>
> > > > + qemu_arch='arm',
> > > > + kernel_path='arch/arm/boot/zImage',
> > > > + kernel_command_line='console=ttyAMA0',
> > > > + extra_qemu_params=['-machine virt'])
> > > > diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/qemu_configs/arm64.py b/tools/testing/kunit/qemu_configs/arm64.py
> > > > new file mode 100644
> > > > index 0000000000000..1ba200bc99f0f
> > > > --- /dev/null
> > > > +++ b/tools/testing/kunit/qemu_configs/arm64.py
> > > > @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
> > > > +from ..qemu_config import QemuArchParams
> > > > +
> > > > +QEMU_ARCH = QemuArchParams(linux_arch='arm64',
> > > > + qemuconfig='''
> > > > +CONFIG_SERIAL_AMBA_PL010=y
> > > > +CONFIG_SERIAL_AMBA_PL010_CONSOLE=y
> > > > +CONFIG_SERIAL_AMBA_PL011=y
> > > > +CONFIG_SERIAL_AMBA_PL011_CONSOLE=y''',
> > > > + qemu_arch='aarch64',
> > > > + kernel_path='arch/arm64/boot/Image.gz',
> > > > + kernel_command_line='console=ttyAMA0',
> > > > + extra_qemu_params=['-machine virt', '-cpu cortex-a57'])
> > > > diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/qemu_configs/i386.py b/tools/testing/kunit/qemu_configs/i386.py
> > > > new file mode 100644
> > > > index 0000000000000..3998af306468e
> > > > --- /dev/null
> > > > +++ b/tools/testing/kunit/qemu_configs/i386.py
> > > > @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
> > > > +from ..qemu_config import QemuArchParams
> > > > +
> > > > +QEMU_ARCH = QemuArchParams(linux_arch='i386',
> > > > + qemuconfig='''
> > > > +CONFIG_SERIAL_8250=y
> > > > +CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_CONSOLE=y''',
> > > > + qemu_arch='x86_64',
> > > > + kernel_path='arch/x86/boot/bzImage',
> > > > + kernel_command_line='console=ttyS0',
> > > > + extra_qemu_params=[''])
> > > > diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/qemu_configs/powerpc.py b/tools/testing/kunit/qemu_configs/powerpc.py
> > > > new file mode 100644
> > > > index 0000000000000..46292ce9e368e
> > > > --- /dev/null
> > > > +++ b/tools/testing/kunit/qemu_configs/powerpc.py
> > > > @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
> > > > +from ..qemu_config import QemuArchParams
> > > > +
> > > > +QEMU_ARCH = QemuArchParams(linux_arch='powerpc',
> > > > + qemuconfig='''
> > > > +CONFIG_PPC64=y
> > > > +CONFIG_SERIAL_8250=y
> > > > +CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_CONSOLE=y
> > > > +CONFIG_HVC_CONSOLE=y''',
> > > > + qemu_arch='ppc64',
> > > > + kernel_path='vmlinux',
> > > > + kernel_command_line='console=ttyS0',
> > > > + extra_qemu_params=['-M pseries', '-cpu power8'])
> > > > diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/qemu_configs/riscv.py b/tools/testing/kunit/qemu_configs/riscv.py
> > > > new file mode 100644
> > > > index 0000000000000..de8c62d465723
> > > > --- /dev/null
> > > > +++ b/tools/testing/kunit/qemu_configs/riscv.py
> > > > @@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
> > > > +from ..qemu_config import QemuArchParams
> > > > +import os
> > > > +import os.path
> > > > +import sys
> > > > +
> > > > +GITHUB_OPENSBI_URL = 'https://github.com/qemu/qemu/raw/master/pc-bios/opensbi-riscv64-generic-fw_dynamic.bin'
> > > > +OPENSBI_FILE = os.path.basename(GITHUB_OPENSBI_URL)
> > > > +
> > > > +if not os.path.isfile(OPENSBI_FILE):
> > > > + print('\n\nOpenSBI file is not in the current working directory.\n'
> > > > + 'Would you like me to download it for you from:\n' + GITHUB_OPENSBI_URL + ' ?\n')
> > > > + response = input('yes/[no]: ')
> > > > + if response.strip() == 'yes':
> > > > + os.system('wget ' + GITHUB_OPENSBI_URL)
> > > > + else:
> > > > + sys.exit()
> > > > +
> > > > +QEMU_ARCH = QemuArchParams(linux_arch='riscv',
> > > > + qemuconfig='''
> > > > +CONFIG_SOC_VIRT=y
> > > > +CONFIG_SERIAL_8250=y
> > > > +CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_CONSOLE=y
> > > > +CONFIG_SERIAL_OF_PLATFORM=y
> > > > +CONFIG_SERIAL_EARLYCON_RISCV_SBI=y''',
> > > > + qemu_arch='riscv64',
> > > > + kernel_path='arch/riscv/boot/Image',
> > > > + kernel_command_line='console=ttyS0',
> > > > + extra_qemu_params=[
> > > > + '-machine virt',
> > > > + '-cpu rv64',
> > > > + '-bios opensbi-riscv64-generic-fw_dynamic.bin'])
> > > > diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/qemu_configs/s390.py b/tools/testing/kunit/qemu_configs/s390.py
> > > > new file mode 100644
> > > > index 0000000000000..04c90332f1098
> > > > --- /dev/null
> > > > +++ b/tools/testing/kunit/qemu_configs/s390.py
> > > > @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
> > > > +from ..qemu_config import QemuArchParams
> > > > +
> > > > +QEMU_ARCH = QemuArchParams(linux_arch='s390',
> > > > + qemuconfig='''
> > > > +CONFIG_EXPERT=y
> > > > +CONFIG_TUNE_ZEC12=y
> > > > +CONFIG_NUMA=y
> > > > +CONFIG_MODULES=y''',
> > > > + qemu_arch='s390x',
> > > > + kernel_path='arch/s390/boot/bzImage',
> > > > + kernel_command_line='console=ttyS0',
> > > > + extra_qemu_params=[
> > > > + '-machine s390-ccw-virtio',
> > > > + '-cpu qemu',])
> > > > diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/qemu_configs/sparc.py b/tools/testing/kunit/qemu_configs/sparc.py
> > > > new file mode 100644
> > > > index 0000000000000..f26b5f27cc5a1
> > > > --- /dev/null
> > > > +++ b/tools/testing/kunit/qemu_configs/sparc.py
> > > > @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
> > > > +from ..qemu_config import QemuArchParams
> > > > +
> > > > +QEMU_ARCH = QemuArchParams(linux_arch='sparc',
> > > > + qemuconfig='''
> > > > +CONFIG_SERIAL_8250=y
> > > > +CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_CONSOLE=y''',
> > > > + qemu_arch='sparc',
> > > > + kernel_path='arch/sparc/boot/zImage',
> > > > + kernel_command_line='console=ttyS0 mem=256M',
> > > > + extra_qemu_params=['-m 256'])
> > > > diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/qemu_configs/x86_64.py b/tools/testing/kunit/qemu_configs/x86_64.py
> > > > new file mode 100644
> > > > index 0000000000000..bd5ab733b92ac
> > > > --- /dev/null
> > > > +++ b/tools/testing/kunit/qemu_configs/x86_64.py
> > > > @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
> > > > +from ..qemu_config import QemuArchParams
> > > > +
> > > > +QEMU_ARCH = QemuArchParams(linux_arch='x86_64',
> > > > + qemuconfig='''
> > > > +CONFIG_SERIAL_8250=y
> > > > +CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_CONSOLE=y''',
> > > > + qemu_arch='x86_64',
> > > > + kernel_path='arch/x86/boot/bzImage',
> > > > + kernel_command_line='console=ttyS0',
> > > > + extra_qemu_params=[''])
> > > > --
> > > > 2.31.1.607.g51e8a6a459-goog
> > > >
