To avoid the ``foo`` markup inside the `bar`__ hyperlink marker, use the "replace" directive [1]. This should restore the intended appearance of the link. Tested with sphinx versions 1.7.9 and 2.4.4. [1]: https://docutils.sourceforge.io/docs/ref/rst/directives.html#replace Signed-off-by: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@xxxxxxxxx> --- Hi Paul, This fixes broken-looking cross reference in section "Publish/Subscribe Guarantee" at: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.html#publish-subscribe-guarantee To-be-replaced macro string can be much shorter. I preserved the whole string considering the readability of .rst. Thanks, Akira -- Documentation/RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.rst | 8 +++++--- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.rst b/Documentation/RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.rst index 38a39476fc24..45278e2974c0 100644 --- a/Documentation/RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.rst +++ b/Documentation/RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.rst @@ -362,9 +362,8 @@ do_something_gp() uses rcu_dereference() to fetch from ``gp``: 12 } The rcu_dereference() uses volatile casts and (for DEC Alpha) memory -barriers in the Linux kernel. Should a `high-quality implementation of -C11 ``memory_order_consume`` -[PDF] <http://www.rdrop.com/users/paulmck/RCU/consume.2015.07.13a.pdf>`__ +barriers in the Linux kernel. Should a |high-quality implementation of +C11 memory_order_consume [PDF]|_ ever appear, then rcu_dereference() could be implemented as a ``memory_order_consume`` load. Regardless of the exact implementation, a pointer fetched by rcu_dereference() may not be used outside of the @@ -374,6 +373,9 @@ element has been passed from RCU to some other synchronization mechanism, most commonly locking or `reference counting <https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/RCU/rcuref.txt>`__. +.. |high-quality implementation of C11 memory_order_consume [PDF]| replace:: high-quality implementation of C11 ``memory_order_consume`` [PDF] +.. _high-quality implementation of C11 memory_order_consume [PDF]: http://www.rdrop.com/users/paulmck/RCU/consume.2015.07.13a.pdf + In short, updaters use rcu_assign_pointer() and readers use rcu_dereference(), and these two RCU API elements work together to ensure that readers have a consistent view of newly added data elements. -- 2.17.1
