On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 11:25 AM Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 10:33:00AM +0800, Fox Chen wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 10:17 AM Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 01:47:16PM +0800, Fox Chen wrote:
> > > > -In the absence of symbolic links, ``walk_component()`` creates a new
> > > > +As the last step of ``walk_component()``, ``step_into()`` will be called either
> > >
> > > You can drop ``..`` from around function named which are followed with
> > > (). d74b0d31ddde ("Docs: An initial automarkup extension for sphinx")
> > > marks them up automatically.
> > >
> >
> > Got it, thanks for letting me know. But I will still use them in this
> > patch series to keep consistency with the remaining parts of the
> > document.
>
> Well, you weren't. For example:
>
> +As the last step of ``walk_component()``, ``step_into()`` will be called either
> +directly from walk_component() or from handle_dots(). It calls
> +``handle_mount()``, to check and handle mount points, in which a new
>
> Neither of the functions on the second line were using ``.
Oh, That was a mistake, They should've been wrapped with ``.
Thanks for pointing it out. I will go through the whole patch set and
fix this type of inconsistency in V3.
thanks,
fox
