On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 10:33:00AM +0800, Fox Chen wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 10:17 AM Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 01:47:16PM +0800, Fox Chen wrote:
> > > -In the absence of symbolic links, ``walk_component()`` creates a new
> > > +As the last step of ``walk_component()``, ``step_into()`` will be called either
> >
> > You can drop ``..`` from around function named which are followed with
> > (). d74b0d31ddde ("Docs: An initial automarkup extension for sphinx")
> > marks them up automatically.
> >
>
> Got it, thanks for letting me know. But I will still use them in this
> patch series to keep consistency with the remaining parts of the
> document.
Well, you weren't. For example:
+As the last step of ``walk_component()``, ``step_into()`` will be called either
+directly from walk_component() or from handle_dots(). It calls
+``handle_mount()``, to check and handle mount points, in which a new
Neither of the functions on the second line were using ``.
