On Wed, Mar 3, 2021 at 12:29 PM Yonghong Song <yhs@xxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 3/2/21 9:19 AM, Joe Stringer wrote:
> > Based on a brief read of the corresponding source code.
> >
> > Acked-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Reviewed-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Joe Stringer <joe@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@xxxxxx>
>
> > ---
> > include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 14 +++++++++++---
> > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> > index a8f2964ec885..a6cd6650e23d 100644
> > --- a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> > @@ -306,14 +306,22 @@ union bpf_iter_link_info {
> > *
> > * BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN
> > * Description
> > - * Run an eBPF program a number of times against a provided
> > - * program context and return the modified program context and
> > - * duration of the test run.
> > + * Run the eBPF program associated with the *prog_fd* a *repeat*
> > + * number of times against a provided program context *ctx_in* and
> > + * data *data_in*, and return the modified program context
> > + * *ctx_out*, *data_out* (for example, packet data), result of the
> > + * execution *retval*, and *duration* of the test run.
>
> FYI, Lorenz's BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN support for sk_lookup program
> requires data_in and data_out to be NULL. Not sure whether it is
> worthwhile to specially mention here or not. The patch has not
> been merged but close.
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210301101859.46045-1-lmb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
Not sure how close either series is but I'm sure between Lorenz & I we
can figure out how to fix this up. If I need to respin the series and
Lorenz's one is in by then, I'll fix it up but it's not the end of the
world to send an extra dedicated patch for this.
